Unwanted Immigrants

Search

Unwanted Immigrants

Let’s be clear. We are not saying all immigrants are bad.

This is a difficult subject to discuss. No matter how you approach it, and regardless of what you say, when you get down to unpleasant facts, someone will accuse you of being racist and/or hateful. This is not who we are. We are prepared for that false criticism, and it doesn’t affect our commitment to telling the truth.

We care about everyone’s feelings… even those quick to judge and not listen. Hard facts need sunlight they haven’t seen in a very long time. They’ve been kept hostage out of fear of violence and being labeled these derogatory things.

If your mind is already made up, we can’t persuade you. You are welcome to read this, but we won’t respond to rhetoric and slander. If the toxic loop playing endlessly in your head tells you we are racist haters, we’ve heard it a gazillion times, and it hasn’t persuaded us to think like you, and it never will. You never bring facts to support your accusations. When you bring what you think are facts, you don’t want to hear why your opponents disagree.

We know we aren’t racist or haters. We’re constantly objective and self-inspecting, and we weigh ourselves against the truth. We embrace Truth…ALL of it.

A Well-Researched and Written Book on This Topic

We offer this discussion of facts to those who can objectively examine a topic without a closed-minded, reflexive diatribe and accusations. By the end of the discussion, we are confident that you will be satisfied that the best interests of all have been served by the truth.

The Melting Pot Question

Unfortunately, the idea that we can become a nation of any and all people sprang out of a misinterpretation of our nation’s motto, “E Pluribus Unum” (Out of Many, One). That idea led to some who are unwanted immigrants becoming citizens of our land today.

But this motto indeed shows that the United States is “the melting pot of the world”. Those who have come here and assimilated are from almost all of the nations of the world. And in theory, we have melted into one people, all allegiant to the Constitution, the laws, and the customs of the United States…among which is the preservation of heritage where it doesn’t interfere with our ways.

Melting Pot Versus Salad Bowl

E Pluribus Unum is better understood by observing human nature. No matter the race or ethnicity, there is a wide spectrum of personalities within each group. Many are good; some are bad. Some have a little love, while others have much love. Some gravitate toward evil, and some gravitate toward good. America wants better quality people from all people groups.

Some people groups, such as Shiite Muslims, for example, because of their beliefs, hate non-Muslims and are violent toward anyone not like them. Those who might yearn to break free from their kinsmen can’t because of the evil hold placed over them. Therefore, even if some do break away from that group, the United States, as a general rule, won’t take them in. There just isn’t a good way to screen for them or guarantee they won’t become enemies within.

Intended Definition of the “Melting Pot”

Because we have admitted immigrants from all over the world, we refer to the United States as the Melting Pot of the World. In our History of Immigration section, you can see the evolution of immigration policies and laws in the United States.

Since the early colonial years, Americans have been concerned with regulating “who” is allowed to become a citizen. After all, their reason for coming here was self-determination and liberty, and some would bring incompatible ideas. There are people in this world with designs to control everything. They don’t have to be world dominators or powerful people like China, Russia, and other dictatorships that swallow up smaller countries. Some inside the country start with anyone who will listen and patiently wait until they have numbers to do something about it. And the United States would be the crown jewel for any of them.

This is why it is important to enforce our immigration laws and not let anyone set a bad precedent by flouting them.

The idea that the US wants any “tired, huddled masses” has led to the perception that we are more of a Tossed Salad. That sentiment is inscribed on a gift from France, not an official US policy. We do value immigrants, but we can’t take on the world’s problems when they can’t stand in unity or on their own here…in unity.

The “tossed salad” group alters the spirit of the “Melting Pot” metaphor, defining it as implying that “During that process, our diverse backgrounds, cultures, and religions melt away as we form a homogeneous American stew.”

We Expect Allegiance to Our Constitution, Ideals, Laws, and Customs

That includes immigration laws. And there are times when immigration laws take on greater importance.

“Melting Pot” refers to the political and governmental aspects of the United States. Everyone is expected to pledge allegiance to our flag, which stands for the law, the Constitution, and the Republic that is the United States. In that respect, we DO all melt together and become “homogeneous”. For those who place additional importance on “democracy”, in our Constitutional Republic, we practice Representative Democracy. Democracy is not left out. It is the engine that propels the Republic, just like Socialism is the engine that propels Communism.

If you have a problem with the Constitution, ideals, laws and customs, you are already indoctrinated in a way that is harmful to the United States, and you are not a good candidate to become a citizen.

We are witnessing the results of people already citizens being indoctrinated against these articles of our government, and now even becoming radicalized and fighting our government. That’s the problem with allowing just anyone to become a citizen. It’s why we have borders. And it’s why we can’t allow an Open Borders policy.

The “Tossed Salad”

But nobody is pushing for a homogeneous people from an ethnic perspective—unless they fail to support the law and Constitution. Sometimes, ethnic or racial lines often define those who don’t support the Constitution and laws. When this happens, dishonest people use the optics of a particular ethnic or racial group being targets to accuse us of being “haters and racists”. The fact that they may belong to a particular ethnic or racial group is incidental, that is, “happening by chance or minor consequence”, not as an agenda to be hateful or racist.

We can accept that Americans are a “Tossed Salad” from an ethnic and racial perspective, but only so far as it doesn’t lead to breaking the laws of the land, literally or in spirit. After all, that is what immigration is about—adding to the nation with people headed in the same direction, not those who would fight you and cause problems. If you come here from a foreign nation expecting to become a US citizen, your attitude will be cooperative—not combative, biligerant, or condemning.

Who IS My Neighbor?

Those protesting the removal of illegal aliens call them “neighbors”. But who are our neighbors? Are our neighbors different than invaders?

Some try to persuade those who believe illegal aliens are invaders rather than neighbors that they are neighbors using Judeo-Christian Scripture. The argument goes: “The Bible commands us to welcome the stranger.” But the Bible also has much to say about Israel’s enemies. You can read about the history of immigration and what a neighbor is in the Biblical sense HERE.

This is an argument being attempted by some Catholic archdioceses.

Does Love Mean Letting Our Enemies Inside Our Borders?

More relevant is the concept of “loving your enemy, and praying for those who persecute you”, as Jesus commanded. But love doesn’t mean letting people come here with hostile intent and abuse our charity. This is why we have immigration laws; it’s why we have borders.

We understand the mission field of having compassion on “neighbors”, and the Catholic church used to set up shop where the people are who need compassion. And they would give sanctuary to those who sought such within the church. That is a form of love, to be sure. But the concept of love doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Other things influence “how” we implement love. If letting those in our country who would harm us is love, then love is self-destruction. It’s without sense.

Human will sometimes plays a part in how we respond to people, even how we practice love. If you want to love an enemy, you don’t let them inside your borders to do that.

What About the “Strangers” and “Neighbors”?

We make a big deal out of us “welcoming the stranger” and “loving our enemies”, but what about those people we are loving and welcoming? What are they doing to reciprocate? We ask that question, not to claim love is quid pro quo (i.e., something for something), but to begin taking a critical look at these so-called “neighbors” and “strangers”.

Is it love to disregard a nation’s immigration laws? What about evading the parole hearing process and deliberately staying in the country illegally? Is it love to put Americans in a position where they are forced to use massive amounts of money to accommodate you? How about undercutting Americans’ wages so they lose their jobs, and you take them? What about the enemy nations that send their killers, rapists, child molesters, thieves, mentally disabled, and indigents they don’t want, who come here and wreak havoc? Are they loving Americans? We think not!

Does loving them mean we have to let them in and keep them here? It’s not like they are “disappeared”. They return to their countries of origin, or they are given a choice of destinations to which to be deported. They are still there, and they didn’t disappear. That’s a dishonest diatribe designed to appeal to emotional people who don’t think things through.

Illegal Invaders

Peter Schweitzer quotes Claudia Sheinbaum in his new book, “The Invisible Coup“, that Mexico has placed 39.9 million Mexican nationals in a network in this country to retake the US Southwest for Mexico. So there are more than 21 million here.

These foreign national aliens who came here illegally (illegal aliens) are a burden on our homeland. Not only do they crowd our cities, but they bring crime, homelessness, mental disabilities, and absolutely no understanding of our laws, Constitution, or expectations. Nor do most of them care about this nation.

A popular slogan today is “America is a nation of immigrants”. Today, this has become a slogan used to push an “Open Borders” political agenda about immigration. The slogan encapsulates ideas that open-borders supporters want to highlight. But it exaggerates the benefits and downplays detractors. It ignores other key demographics of America (and all countries) that are harmful to America. Like all “old sayings”, it has some basis in truth. But it is also overused in a harmful way.

Our National Identity is Being Stolen Through Immigration

This Mark Levin video is an excellent case for immigration overhaul. Here’s Mark Levin on Immigration laws in this video. And here is Mark Levin discussing illegal immigration with Peter Schweitzer.

Immigration and Countries of Origin Indoctrination That Could Radicalize and Trouble The United States

There are no guarantees that the people seeking asylum here are compatible with our way of life. When a migrant comes from their native land, they bring some of the thinking from that land with them. And not all of that thinking is compatible with the United States culture, laws, or Constitution.

We all get indoctrinated with culture, ideas, philosophies, religion, etc. But some personalities are such that, under some circumstances, violent indoctrination arises within them, and they become radicalized. And soon they try to harm Americans. Many times they succeed.

A country never wants to bring that kind of trouble on itself. But especially if it is a foreign import. Our own troubled citizens are enough to handle without taking on more.

This type of immigrant is not welcome in America, but it is hard to vet and screen them out.

There are those who hate the United States and what it stands for. These are people with different life philosophies that are incompatible with human rights, freedom, and self-governance (e.g., “democracy”). Some of them are intent upon changing everyone to conform to their worldview.

We like to keep our enemies outside our borders. And this topic is a safety and security concern…not love versus hate. People have free will and will make their own decisions. If someone is determined enough not to assimilate or adapt, they become a security and safety concern. It’s why we lock up those who have stubborn criminal or beligerent wills and commit crimes. And we have more than enough of that type who are legal citizens. We don’t need to import those from other countries.

What Makes an Unwanted Immigrant?

We don’t expect people to come here and immediately try to change things generally for everyone. For example, we don’t want Shiite Muslims to come in and begin enforcing Sharia law. Communists (and Socialists for that matter) would overthrow the government if they had the chance, and are hostile to our Constitution and laws. We don’t want to take on the world’s problem people, like criminals, the mentally disabled, and the freeloading indigents who either can’t or won’t take care of themselves and burden our welfare system. We don’t want other nations’ substance abuse dependents.

This is not an exhaustive list. Any person or people like these, and any other problem we didn’t cover, are not good candidates as US immigrants.

In this respect, we must be a Melting Pot, not a tribal, individualistic, vagabond, detached, uncooperative, isolated “Tossed Salad” with individual ingredients lying in the salad bowl. If we use the “Tossed Salad” allegory, then the salad dressing of the Constitution and our laws is necessary to tie us all together and flavor us in a palatable way.

The point is that yes, we can be viewed as ingredients of a tossed salad (our individuality, uniqueness, and diversity), but that salad is offensive and not palatable if we aren’t tied together by the commonality, the salad dressing of the Constitution and our laws, customs, and infrastructural traditions.

The Temptation to Accuse the US of Being White Nationalists

Some Americans look at the effort to mass deport illegal aliens and note that most of those being deported are brown and black-skinned people. And they look at the government, which is mostly from the White race. Then, without facts, decide that the government must be racist because it is deporting mostly brown and black-skinned people. They are “profiling people who have a foreign accent”.

10.2 million of the 10.3 million people who came in are brown- and black-skinned.

Race is Incidental to Who Are Targeted for Deportation

We now know without a doubt that Mexico has conspired to retake the American Southwest from the United States. Right now, it’s simply by squatting on the land illegally. We have on written record the Mexican president’s comments to that effect. They admit to 39.9 million Mexican Nationals being here (both legally and illegally) who have conspired to take the land by invasion. So we can confidently say the incidence IS deliberate and purposeful. They are all Mexicans. Most are here illegally, and all are here as invaders.

The fact that LEGAL Mexican immigrants are here and participating in an illegal invasion by immigration shows the significant and serious flaws in our vetting process. Also, the process of giving amnesty and birthright citizenship is something we need to look at seriously. We need to end mass amnesty and birthright citizenship altogether, just on the invasion problem with Mexico.

And they aren’t the only ones trying to invade by immigration.

Examples of Immigrants Who Have Come Here Who Aren’t Good Immigration Candidates

Muslim “Caliphate” Invaders (An Example of Hostile Invasion by Immigration)

“…Mass immigration is a form of revenge and conquest. Just ask Wajahat Ali,” wrote senior Federalist contributor Adam Johnston.” (The Blaze).

Wajahat Ali is a Pakistani of immigrant parents…a so-called “birthright citizen” because he was born here. Ali is a social media influencer on the “The Left Hook” podcast. He has contributed to the New York Times and Al Jazeera, among other left-wing and far-left organizations. To watch his podcast is like watching any Muslim extremist terrorist rant.

“Ali launched into a … tirade on a recent episode of his podcast, “The Left Hook,” suggesting that Trump’s proposed effort to “rid the country of antipathetic foreign elements” is a lost cause. In all his rage, however, the former Al Jazeera host appears to have unwittingly justified Trump’s plan as well as lent additional credibility to the so-called great replacement theory.” (The Blaze, Dec. 4, 2025, Wajahat Ali says quiet part out loud in attack on Trump’s re-migration plan: ‘Mistake that you made is you let us in’).

“We’re not going back. I want all the hatemongers who watch this — and I hope they do watch this because I know they hate-watch us — you’ve lost. You have lost. You lost. The mistake that you made is you let us in in the first place.” Wajahat Ali, “The Left Hook” podcast.

“See, that’s the thing with brown people, and I’m going to say this as a brown person. There’s a lot of us. Like, a lot. There’s like 1.2 billion in India. There’s more than 200 million in Pakistan. There’s like 170 million in Bangladesh. Those are just the people there,” continued Ali. “There’s a bunch of us, and we breed. We’re a breeding people — and the problem is you let us in in 1965.”

Where Immigration is Concerned, Caliphate IS a Replacement Theory

Replacement Theory is not a false, unfounded conspiracy theory as so many far-left media and activists would like everyone to believe. It exists! Detractors have no proof that it is a false theory, but as is their usual tactic, they irresponsibly broadcast falsehoods.

And when discovered, they just wait out the public’s memory of the lie and do it again… and again. They persuade those who are deluded and engage in wishful thinking. But the country knows at this point they are liars and unreliable sources for information.

First of all, a conspiracy can be valid or invalid based on the facts relevant to the topic. A theory is simply something believed until proof arises that demonstrates it is wrong. Science operates on theories. A “conspiracy theory explains an event or set of circumstances as a result of a plot by conspirators”.

A Conspiracy Theory can be completely legitimate. The political left often adopts the label as a dodge to take focus off of something they are doing wrong. And they try to discredit people for having that theory. Hillary Clinton is best known for her constant diatribe about “the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy Theory”, for example.

Invasion by Fecundity – An Immigration Plot

The Ottoman Empire – Radical Islam’s Attempt at Worldwide Conquest – A Muslim Caliphate

So their philosophy is to take ground for Islam with the design of taking over the entire world. They are patient and willing to wait even millennia to accomplish their goal.

Shiite Muslims Are Bad Immigration Candidates

Not all Muslims are extremists, but the Shiite Muslims are extreme in their ideology. They call the United States “The Great Satan” and Israel “The Little Satan”. Muslim Extremists are avowed enemies of non-Muslims. They constantly attempt to invade and subdue all lands they invade through conquest.

And Iran is the control-center of it all. Qatar is involved as well. Qatar has been called “An international bank with borders” because it brokers deals with all nations, including Iran. With Iran, Qatar brokers the Iranian “pay for slay” program. The program pays Muslim extremists to murder non-Muslims—especially Israelis and Americans.

These are not the kind of people we want to allow to migrate to the United States. They pose an imminent danger to Americans.

The Ottoman Empire Shows the Attitude of Muslim Extremists

The Ottoman Empire was an expanding empire, with designs on making the entire world into a caliphate.

“A caliphate is a form of Islamic state or government in which the leader, a caliph (from the Arabic khalifah, meaning “successor” or “deputy”), is considered the successor to the Prophet Muhammad and the supreme political and religious leader of the entire Muslim community (ummah).”

“In the 20th and 21st centuries, the idea of re-establishing a caliphate has been an aspiration of extremist Muslims. It’s a symbol of past Muslim unity and power. This goal has primarily been pursued by violent extremist groups, such as Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), which declared a self-styled caliphate in parts of Iraq and Syria in 2014. The claims of these groups are rejected by many Muslims and are not recognized by any nation-states.”

Hostile Rogue Islamic Representatives in the US Legislature

Ilhan Abdullahi Omar was born to Somali asylum seekers who were granted asylum because of the war in Somalia. Ilhan came here with her parents and became a citizen in 2000 at 17.

She constantly attacks our system and the White race, using unfounded arguments that activists and anarchists use to disrupt our government and US policies, demanding we change things and destroy our Constitution. She typically defers to unfounded “racism” accusations to punctuate her arguments.

Rashida Tliab is the 14th child of illegal “Palestinian” immigrants, born in the US…a so-called “birthright citizen” and exactly what can go wrong with the Birhright ruling. She is also a Michigan congresswoman.

Like Omar, she complains about our ways here and pushes to destroy the Constitution as well. She has been a very outspoken proponent of the “Palestinians” and against our best Middle East ally, Israel. None of her accusations is grounded in fact, and she denies history.

A Rogue Islamic Mayor in a US City

Abdullah Hammoud’s parents are Lebanese immigrants, and available sources indicate his mother became a U.S. citizen. The sources do not explicitly state whether his father is a citizen. Abdullah is another Birthright citizen example.

We don’t know whether they went through the legal immigration process or are open to assimilation here. Their behavior and attitudes since coming here give us a clue about their attitude toward assimilation. They seem intent upon turning the US into a radical Muslim theocracy through a caliphate.

Radical Islam indoctrinates Shia Muslims. It is a small step from indoctrination to a fully radicalized follower. Hammoud appears to be a “birthright citizen” who is radicalized by his parents’ faith. We know Hammoud adopts the most radical positions of American left-wing activists.

Brazen Muslim Declarations in US Cities

Recently, Hammoud made national headlines when he told a Dearborn pastor in a city council meeting to speak against a proposed anti-LBGT+ resolution…

“You’re an Islamophobe. And although you live here, I want you to know as mayor, you are not welcome here. The day you move out of the city will be the day I launch a parade celebrating the fact that you moved out of the city.”

The pastor was a native resident, the son of several generations of Americans. He was branded by the mayor as “Islamophobic” because he didn’t submit to the Muslim precept of being anti-LGBT+.

American Christians and Jews are against LGBT+ behavior because God calls it an abomination. But we don’t go around calling LGBT+ Americans “Christianphobic” or “Judaiaphobic” or invite them to leave our communities. We have every bit as much fervor for our God and Scripture as any Islamic.

Biden’s “Open Borders” illegal policy has allowed tens of millions of migrants hostile to our nation to come in.

This mayor has a beligerant attitude toward non-Muslim citizens.

Islamic Diffidentia Not Islamophobia

Since when does disagreeing with the position of an Islamic mean “fear of Islamics or their faith”? Maybe Islamic diffidentia (“distrust of Islam”) would be appropriate instead of Islamophobia, and so what if you do distrust them. Barging their way into our country and demanding we change to knuckle under their belief system is not a welcome change in America.

Shiite Muslims have given us many reasons to distrust them. They flew airplanes into our twin towers on 9/11/2001, taking nearly 3,000 lives on that day. Their leaders, who have pushed their way into American politics in an unfriendly, unsupportive manner, stand defiantly on podiums and behind microphones, telling us they are here to stay and they are planning to make us into an Islamic state (e.g., witness Rashida Tlaib in a 2025 rally where she told her many Muslim supporters, cheering her on, these very words).

Distrust is a different thing from fear or hatred. Attempting to psychoanalyze a stranger you have never met and determine they have an irrational fear (a “phobia”) is unobjective, irresponsible, reckless, and unwarranted…not to mention untrue.

A Mayor Isn’t There to be Hostile Toward Constituents

That is especially true when a public official at a public meeting makes such an analysis of the people there who are voicing their concerns. The officials are there to take in concerns and find ways to address them… not condemn those who have them. Inviting constituents to leave and planning a parade to mark their departure is NOT an appropriate solution or an American attitude. His attitude was hostile and uncooperative with the system.

Shiite Muslim ideology is incompatible with being a citizen in the US, despite Hammoud’s idea that “We put into practice the ideal that people of all backgrounds, of all faiths, and of all beliefs can live peacefully and respectfully as neighbors…” Was he respectful of this non-Muslim constituent, there to voice his concerns? Not hardly.

Living “peacefully and respectfully” is different from living in ideological harmony. You can’t enforce your particular beliefs on others and expect them to be compliant. This mayor proved that he couldn’t put it into practice either.

Blacks Are a Unique People in Our History

Enemies Within Who Are Baked Into Our Society

Because of slavery, and we would argue the charitable nature of the US, we created a class of people in America who are enemies to America because of bitterness and unforgiveness. They stylize their victim’s position and leverage that for anything and everything they can get. They push for time off for crimes to reparations, and everything in between. Anytime you disagree with them, the “Race Card” gets played.

The Cosplay

Today we hear some who read this saying, “Yeah, right! ‘Freedom’. A portion of the American population believes this whole nation was built on the backs of enslaved Blacks. It’s an overstatement and exaggeration. There is a valid, but slightly different and important point buried in that notion. Blacks were forced to contribute to the building of the United States through slave-labor. It’s a point we refuse to trivialize, but neither will we overemphasize their contribution.

And isn’t the posture that the US was built on the backs of enslaved Blacks going too far?

After all, everyone worked hard and contributed to the building of the United States. Many even died in the quest to free them. Not many of those were Blacks. And not many Blacks participated in the industrialization of America. However, enslaved Blacks did their part without personal enrichment or freedom. They had no say in whether they wanted to participate in building America, and that’s the arguable point raised by the Black population.

The Fourteenth Amendment

The Fourteenth Amendment gave formerly enslaved Blacks the right to decide if they wanted to participate in the building of America going forward. It broke the bondage of their enslavement. Those who stayed, which is almost all of them, agreed, whether knowingly or not, with the laws of the land and the Constitution by default.

Blacks were an important part of the efforts that built this nation, but not the sum total.

Today, some Blacks demand “reparations” for their uncompensated part in building this nation, also for what their ancestors had suffered in the way of setbacks to a normal life in the US. But it requires speculation to know who to compensate. After all, it’s impossible to know which family lines would have grown their wealth and which would never have obtained it or squandered what they had.

In the US today, we have compensated Blacks through the Civil Rights Amendment, and things like Equal Opportunity and other advantages given to Blacks that all other Americans don’t have. Not to mention the blood and treasure spilled during the Civil War.

There are no guarantees in life—for any of us—and each generation has to take care of itself. Many people won and lost fortunes in life. Many free people received inheritence and squandered it. The best any of us can do is plan for good outcomes in our lives and work toward achieving them.

But the fact that Blacks remain uncompensated for any possible benefits their ancestors were denied embitters them against the country and the descendants of those who enslaved their ancestors. This, too, is harmful to the country.

We Protected, Sheltered, Clothed, and Fed Enslaved Blacks

There is another side to that coin. Blacks benefited from shelter, clothing, and food. Even enslavers didn’t leave them naked and hungry under the weather. They also benefited from US military protection. It’s easy to negate a benefit when the benefit is that something doesn’t happen because that benefit is there. And when America finally addressed emancipating enslaved Blacks, they benefited from those who fought and sacrificed their future by dying or becoming maimed on behalf of the enslaved. Very few Blacks perished because of the Civil War. They were mostly White.

But those who demand even more compensation rarely (if ever) acknowledge those sacrifices and benefits. Food, shelter, and clothing are essential for everyone, and those who were not enslaved weren’t guaranteed them. The enslaved had them without worry. It’s another benefit that usually gets ignored.

Founded for Freedom’s Sake—Not For Racism

The founders didn’t introduce slavery to the colonies (before founding a nation that broke free from England’s king, who DID introduce slavery).

The colonists were subject to the economic levers that enslaved Blacks brought to the colonies. Because slavery was baked into the colonial economy, those who had a need for cheap labor and could afford it utilized slaves. They had to tie up wealth in the use of the enslaved just as someone might tie up wealth in a savings bond today. They were guilty of keeping it going in the new nation, but had progressed to the point of doing so with a better attitude toward the enslaved.

The Concept of Liberty is Baked Into the Constitution

That’s thanks to the deliberation they worked through in writing the Constitution, which had at its heart this idea of liberty. Still, they didn’t do it with a racist purpose, and they didn’t have a lot of economic choice in the matter.

As vile and repugnant as it sounds today, enslaved Blacks were seen as assets like livestock. That’s just an unpleasant fact. As assets, they represented wealth to those who possessed them.

Trapped in an economy where assets included enslavement for production instituted by edict of an English king who wanted to develop the colonies “on the cheap”, they used slaves to survive and thrive in that economy. In that sense, they were “encouraged” to invest their wealth in enslaved Blacks. They couldn’t compete otherwise.

That created a big financial and economic problem when considering freeing the enslaved at the beginning of the United States.

Many Complications Tied to the Revolutionary War Kept Slavery Going in the New Nation

And that wasn’t the only problem. There were a couple of logistical and tactical problems that also made it impossible to free the enslaved and also fight the British in a War of Revolution.

Rather than rebuilding the whole argument about why enslaved Blacks weren’t a racist scheme of the Founding Fathers and the US government on this page about immigration, please read about it here.

Blacks Played a Key Role in the Formation of Immigration Policies

The Fourteenth Amendment was made law because of the problems created for Blacks living in this country when they became emancipated. They were previously considered chattel because they were bought, sold, traded, and inherited like other forms of wealth or livestock.

After emancipation, Blacks were people we needed to consider who lived here. Were they citizens here, or what were we to do with them? We gave them the right to be citizens of the United States in the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution.

The Founders were committed to the ideology of the Constitution, which promotes freedom rather than enslaving people.

Detractors of the Constitution have never proven that it is racist or flawed. They engage in reckless speculation to incite the willfully ignorant against the Constitution. Systemic racism is not baked into the system as some on the political left suggest. Those who accept an idea that it is, are living in a delusion, spurred on by what they want to believe…not the truth. It’s wishful thinking. It’s manufactured in their heads.

If Americans Were Racist There Might Still Be Slavery & We Wouldn’t Allow Immigration From Nations of Color

Despite the tremendous loss of personal wealth resulting from freeing the enslaved, the US made the painful decision to engage in the Civil War to end slavery. There was no compensation for Americans who lost wealth. And there was no compensation for those who lost their lives or spent the rest of their lives maimed on behalf of freeing the enslaved.

Because of the ideology enshrined in the US Constitution, we DID end enslavement. The very Constitution that some on the political left condemn today as being “racist”. It happened because we are a freedom-loving nation, and the Constitution is full of the ideas that promote freedom.

We didn’t enslave people because of hypocrisy. The founders struggled, pondered, argued…even fought over freeing enslaved people in the new nation. It wasn’t possible because we had to break away from England, and there was no time to arrange economic support to free them.

But it did eventually happen! And that point invalidates all other complaints related to “systemic racism”.

Systemic Racism Conspiracy Theory-Based Enemies to the United States

They argue that slavery is incompatible with Judeo-Christian ideals, so the US, practicing slavery, contradicts itself. Detractors say slavery nullifies the Constitution. We believe those who make that argument are looking only at convenient facts and ignoring the truth that shows the Constitution made emancipation possible. Historic circumstances forced it to continue into the new nation—not a racist ideology.

Without a sound argument, they superstitiously argue that our country didn’t get rid of slavery, so it is founded on hate and racism. Because of this mindset, they reject the Constitution out of hand.

We concede only that some may have been driven by racism and hate, but those were almost exclusively those who stood to lose their wealth if Blacks were emancipated.

The Fallacy of Systemic Racism in the United States

Bad implementation of good ideas can happen for unavoidable reasons. Enslaved Blacks represented wealth and valuable productivity. These things were needed to wage the Revolutionary War. And people were understandably reluctant to give up their wealth.

Those who believe this idea (without studying history or replacing it with unfounded ideas) constantly reject the Constitution. They defy the laws they deem “unreasonable” and constantly seek to change them. But they don’t have the numbers to support their unpopular, controlling ideas. It’s really a witch hunt.

The Reconquista Movement (An Example of Peaceful Invasion by Immigration) 

A Book by Peter Schweitzer titled “The Invisible Coup” details this hostile action, and several others. The book chronicles 39.9 million Mexican nationals networked throughout America, stationed by Mexico in an attempt to retake the US Southwest simply by squatting on the land (for now).

This is one type of immigrant we don’t want living here, because they fight against us from inside our borders.

Chinese Nationals Stealing Intellectual Property & Spying On National Secrets

Every Chinese national is expected to report to the Chinese Politburo what they have gleaned from their foreign endeavors. They come here by the hundreds of thousands each year to study at US Colleges and Universities, and they work in US jobs involving technology, including military technology.

What do you think they are going to do with that knowledge when they get back home? That’s right, they’re going to share the technology with the Chinese Politburo.

And what’s worse is that the Chinese, knowing our current Birthright Citizenship policies (which are based on a bad Supreme Court ruling in 1898), have tailored an entire industry around Birthright tourism. According to Peter Schweitzer, there are over 100,000 US-born birthright citizens who are Chinese nationals, living in China and subject to the influence of the Chinese government. Within a generation, they will have over a million legal US voters.

Who would these Chinese nationals vote for in our elections? With the Democrat party hell-bent on destroying this country, those Chinese will vote for the party destroying us. The Chinese are not good neighbors from across the Pacific. They make even worse neighbors living in our communities.

Domestic Enemies Inside Our Borders

Since President Trump took office for his second term, Democrats have been fighting tooth and nail to keep the illegal immigrants they let flood into our nation here. Why? Americans voted for Trump, in large part, to fix our immigration problem and mass deport those living here illegally. They’re on the 20% side of this 80/20 issue! Why?

We aren’t privy to their underlying motivation. They say they are being compassionate and trying to help those less privileged people around the world have a chance at a better life. But to fight for them much harder than they do for the protection, safety, and comfort of their own constituents?! Something is wrong with that picture, and there must be a hidden motive behind their actions.

A Moral Covering

We outline the tactics of a social activist named Saul Alinsky on this website. He invented processes that have proven very effective for social activists seeking to circumvent the establishment to advance their agenda. Barack Obama taught his tactics at the college level in Chicago before he was a senator for one term, before becoming the President of the USA. Hillary Clinton is also a huge fan of Alinsky.

Among Alinsky’s ideologies is one we will refer to as “A Moral Covering”. It essentially directs activists who believe their agenda would not be acceptable to the public at large to “wrap the agenda in a moral covering”. In other words, tell the public you are working toward a moral goal which can cover up the real motivation…the hidden agenda…while you are working on that agenda.

The Hidden Agenda

Where immigration is concerned, the moral goal is giving less fortunate people around the globe a chance at a better life here in the US. The hidden agenda is to move in and befriend lots of people you can count on to be loyal to you in elections.

Democrats hatched the “Open Borders” scheme that moved a lot of people in. And treating them better than their own constituents…even breaking our immigration laws to demonstrate their loyalty to these illegals…befriended them.

Inside Our Borders the Game Changes

And once inside our borders, a lot of processes began to happen that benefited Democrats with their new armies of potential immigrant voters, that have moved them into the election system in growing numbers inside our borders. Most of them are from Latin America (Central and South America and Mexico).

The Latin Americans here illegally have a straightforward, though secret agenda. They just want the land back that they lost in the Mexican-American War that was ceded to the US.

But Democrats have a licentious agenda. They worked to shift elections from barely winning to so close that a few hundred votes could tip the balance. Now they’re working on importing immigrant voters in large numbers so they can ensure wins in every election. And they’ve proved that theory in places like Colorado, which went from a red state to purple, and now, 18 years later, it is a deep blue state thanks to illegal aliens voting in Colorado elections. And they’ve moved that model around the country while building up the number of illegal aliens in the US.

Mexicans are working in cahoots because of their agenda. Colleges and Universities are working in cahoots because they are getting funding from activist billionaires who want to take over the country (mostly Democrats, but some are also communists). Billionaires are working in cahoots with Democrats because their agenda aligns with them. They are all conspiring to work in the same direction.

Conspiracy Theory?

Is this a conspiracy theory? You bet! It’s a conspiracy because, whether formal or incidental, these groups are conspiring to work together on agendas that are not honest or fair.

And it’s a theory because we haven’t seen it play out yet, but we can predict the outcomes with reasonable certainty. So, yes, it is a conspiracy theory. But not all conspiracy theories exist in the minds of the unstable, as Hillary Clinton would have you believe.

Some conspiracy theories are valid, and this is one of them. All one has to do is study the mechanisms involved and the inevitable outcomes of where they are headed.

If illegal immigration is allowed to continue unabated this way, we will have a one-party nation controlled exclusively by Democrats and ignoring the will of half the nation because we can never elect representation equal to theirs.

But that’s not all. With Latin Americans trying to take back the Southwest, Democrats, once they gain complete control of the country, will be dealing with an invasion by immigration. They will be in a bind because if they rid the nation of Latin American illegal immigrants, they will lose their supermajority of voters.

And the Chinese and Radical Muslims are waiting in the wings for their shot at the US.

All because we let in unwanted immigrants. It’s a real problem we can’t afford to trivialize.

---

Send your thoughts and questions on Unwanted Immigrants in the United States

---