This site is all about accounting for the hope of a Creator, God if you will.
Christians are always citing the Bible and saying things about our origins that don't seem to add up. Are we crazy? Just what
is it we know that secular, more logically minded people don't know? Is that even the situation? Science has a more clear picture to present, and
Christians seem to ignore science.
"Why even argue?" you may ask. "Science has the answers and Religion will lose the argument about our origins in the end." you may say. Well....maybe not.
Lava flows into the ocean creating new land.
Consider this: Science uses only physical evidence to arrive at its conclusions about the origins of life, yet they have proven
that higher dimensions exist. They don't know how many, or if there is life
within them, but they're out there and Science doesn't even consider them in developing their theories about life's origins.
It probably needs said, before this is too far along, that this is not a Scientology site. This site supports the belief in
a higher being, known as God. But we are also aware that we exist in a physical/natural world and are therefore quite in tune with physical senses
for understanding the world around us. So we have geared this site around that thought to help people understand how an invisible God not
readily apparent in the physical world could exist. So it is from the doorway of science that this site explores.
Science will go no farther than what it can concretely prove in physical terms to explore life's origins...even though most of what exists
likely is Metaphysical* in nature. There's scientific proof that things lie beyond the
three spatial dimensions and time our physical lives exist in, but because we can't concretely measure and observe those things,
Science simply ignores them.
Why is this important? Because a Creator we can't sense or measure physically might dwell in higher dimensions we can't perceive.
In fact a part of our own being might exist in those higher dimensions. And that would tie all of the physical observations about our origins, to an observation
Science admits;
that the universe and life within it shows indications that it has "some form of intelligence" behind their creation. And this would explain why that Creator is
an invisible, mysterious force to us.
We can't prove those metaphysical things exist because they are beyond the physical Scientific means to prove them....not because they are myth;
they're not and Science has proved that. We limit ourselves
to just physical evidence because that is all we are capable of perceiving without complex mathematical equations that only the
extremely intelligent scientifically trained minds are capable of forming, and with difficulty, understanding. Are we interested in truth? Or merely how we wish
our surroundings were defined...living in a dream world? Most of us want the truth; we want to know what lies ahead to prepare for it. Using Scientific,
non-Creationist theories as an excuse to avoid exploring what lies ahead is far more superstitious than any other explanation of our origins and where we
are headed. It is self-delusional and self-decieving. It's dishonest to use logical sounding excuses to avoid facing a Creator.
Knowing those things are out there leaves us wholly dissatisfied with only physical explanations about our origins. Whether
Science is willing to examine it or not, those things do exist. Things beyond our ability to perceive except in our
imaginations. Because we can only perceive them in our imagination, where we are accustomed to calling them imaginary, mythical,
superstitious, or just plain "out there in the weeds beyond reality"; we tend to think of such things as non-existent. Or we simply satisfy ourselves with
the partial explanation offered in physical terms hoping, some day, to find a way to examine those things. But does a partial,
minimal explanation satisfy our curiosity about what is out there? Or are we just forgetting to include them in our exploration of the origins of life?
If we were created by someone in higher dimensions, wouldn't it be with purpose? Wouldn't that make finding out the purpose pretty important?
Think of it. What we've just said is, because Science can't form the concepts of these metaphysical things they have proven can and probably do
exist, they will ignore them in arriving at a theory of our origins. Science will ignore things...maybe vast arrays of important things...because we can't perceive
them. Is the fact we can't objectively measure or observe these things justification for not considering them? It depends how deeply you want to investigate;
how rounded and complete you want to explain life's origins. It seems important to look into it, but non-Creationist Science isn't interested.
Does that sound like Science to ignore something they know exists that is relevant to the investigation? Not the Science always advertised
and vehemently, forcefully argued by secular Scientists. Actually, it sounds like what Science successful argued against during the
"Scopes Monkey Trial" in the early twentieth century. It sounds like
the kind of blind faith that lost "Religion" that case back in Dayton Tennessee in 1925 (supposedly settling once and for all the existence of that mythological
Judeo-Christian God). Yet our culture accepted it and proceeded as though it were the sum-total
of facts to consider; calling the move "progress", (from which the concept of "progressivism" developed).
Speaking of being dissatisfied with physical explanations, listen to what this medical doctor has to say.
Did you know that Science, as related to investigating life's origins, is a religion? "How so?", you may ask. Let's begin with a straight-forward non-biased
definition of Religion. It can
be found in Merriam-Webster online as the fourth most popular definition in terms of usage: Religion: a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith. What we accept in Science about our
origins is
certainly based on principles, and because no human was around at the formation of the universe, the events weren't witnessed or
recorded in books or proven with Scientific method, and we take these things on faith that they are true. So in the same sense that
Creationist ideas are religious, secular
scientific ideas about our origins (e.g., "the Big-Bang" and "Evolution") are also a religion based on faith.
In light of this, it seems Creationism is back in the discussion on the same level ground as non-Creationist, "Scientific" theories about our
origins. No more arguing that Creationism can't prove some of the things they base their ideas on, because neither can Evolutionists or Big-Bang theorists.
The disturbing thing about this that seems to make Creationists look to have more integrity and comprehension about life's origins is that Science deliberately ignores
what may turn out to be the vast majority of evidence because it has no way to measure or observe it. In light of that, these ideas aren't even a religion that stand
up to the rigors of Creationism. Ironic, but there is something more to this than literally meets the eye, and it is wholly dissatisfying to accept "Evolution" and
"Big Bang" as the definitive whole story about the origins of life...or what life is for that matter.
Isn't there something discretely "superstitious" about a person who will hold fast to a belief that ignores
facts? And that's just what secular Science holds against Creationists. Science and particularly those who
rely on mere physical scientific evidence to explain life's origins constantly mock Creationists as "superstitious" and "backwards", but who looks backwards and
superstitious now? It's all perspective. The point is, both sides of the argument take faith to believe,
(as do all theories on our origins), and since Science ignores part of Science to arrive at its conclusions (that Creationism considers by implication), the
edge belongs to Creationism. And there is much more to say on this; a number of misconceptions to correct; and many things between Creationism and
Evolution/Big Bang that can be connected.
Depiction of a warp in space/time. Some say God is dead, but what if He exists in higher dimensions invisible to our ability
to sense and observe?
Back in times past, at the beginning of the industrial age before the Big Bang theory was developed, and before Darwin took off, science minded
people
would argue that God may have created our physical world, but having no physical evidence to support the idea of God interacting with us, they concluded
that God must be dead. But in light of the above discussion, suppose God isn't dead; just invisible to us in our limited
physical dimensions. The fact there is likely more out there than the physical that can tie together our observations in the physical, and how things appear to
have intelligence behind their existence is very compelling. If there is no Creator, we are just temporary physical organisms that will live our lives and
pass out of existence. But if there is a Creator, and that person or persons had reasons for creating us, wouldn't the truth about that become important to us?
Would it also suggest that we too may possibly someday exist in higher dimensions? Do we already and just don't know it? It's all worth exploring because
of the ramifications.
Those ideas we have come to believe as "Religious", specifically the Judeo-Christian faith, does consider more than physical evidence.
Did you know that Christianity, (and it's root faith Judaism) are the only religions that claim God sought us out, while all other enduring and widely accepted
faiths emphasize seeking God? Doesn't a faith that describes God seeking us out seem to hold more hope for finding truth, than one that is man groping for an
invisible god? Explore this site and learn about depictions of higher dimensions interacting with ours documented in the Judeo-Christian faiths.
There are those in the Judeo-Christian faiths who believe a literal translation of the Creation story, but many are open to
a melding of what is written in Scripture and what Science has discovered in physical evidence about our origins, with the caveat that none of this is conclusively
provable and may not even be close to the truth, but for the sake of finding common ground for discussion, it is plausible from both sides. Those things are discussed
elsewhere on this website. A big point this site intends to make is that "religion" actually considers the metaphysical things that science
leaves out of the discussion. So in point of fact, "religion" has a more comprehensive explanation than secular "science" in the end. And
that is the thrust of this website; it is why this website exists...to explore these other things and possibly to tie the "science"
to the "religion" of Creationism.
The details are discovered and worked out in day to day discoveries. This site is dedicated to informing people of something not
often considered, but which might turn out to be the most important topic anyone will consider in their lifetimes...our origins, and
if deliberately designed by a Creator, what the implications are to us.
_______________________________________________________________________________ * Metaphysical:of or relating to
things that are thought to exist but that cannot be seen." Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary
These are things that go beyond the physical dimension we exist in and are therefore
not able to be perceived using our physical senses or even machines we could build to detect and observe higher dimensions. Higher
dimensions do exist which are more complex than ours; it is proven scientifically and is therefore a part of Science.
